Coverage for Egypt and the Nile Valley (for the Ancient World in general, click here)

Because of its organic growth and evolving focus since 2005 (see history), Trismegistos Texts has a very different coverage according to region, period and genre. The following tables provide estimations of the current coverage for published documents.

800 BC - AD 800

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Greek papyrology almost 100%
Greek epigraphy almost 100%
Latin papyrology almost 100%
Latin epigraphy almost 100%
Demotic papyrology and epigraphy almost 100%
Hieroglyphic and hieratic papyrology ca. 95% ?
Hieroglyphic and hieratic epigraphy perhaps 40% ? (excluding 'temple texts')
Coptic papyrology almost 100%
Coptic epigraphy perhaps 40% ?
Aramaic papyrology and epigraphy ca. 95% ?
Meroitic epigraphy ca. 95% ?
Old Nubian papyrology and epigraphy perhaps 90% ?
Arabic papyrology perhaps 90% ?

Before 800 BC

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Hieroglyphic and hieratic papyrology only Books of the Dead and documentary material from Deir el-Medina (both almost 100%)
Hieroglyphic and hieratic epigraphy almost completely lacking

After AD 800

Language / Script / Genre Coverage of Trismegistos Texts (estimated)
Greek papyrology and epigraphy ca. 90% ?
Old Nubian papyrology and epigraphy ca. 50% ?
Coptic papyrology only documentary material (almost 100%)
Coptic epigraphy limited coverage, only Koptisches Sammelbuch material
Arabic papyrology only documents, ca. 10% ?
Arabic epigraphy completely lacking
Hebrew material (e.g. Geniza) completely lacking

For unpublished documents, the coverage is very problematic to estimate. Our main source of information are the collection-based tools.