Introduction

Names in the ancient world is a tool dealing with personal names in the ancient Graeco-Roman world. In a first phase, as an offshoot of Trismegistos' participation in the Eagle project (see SNAP & NER below), it focuses on names in Latin inscriptions, except for the main Ptolemaic territories (Egypt, Cyrenaica and Cyprus), for which names in the Greek inscriptions from the Ptolemaic period have been added between 2010-2012. Starting from the Clauss / Slaby database, the Latin inscriptions are currently processed province by province, starting in North Africa (currently excluding Africa Proconsularis and Numidia, due to the large corpus there). The next region that will be tackled is the Eastern Mediterranean, starting with Arabia and Iudaea. Since this is a part-time, one-man show, progress is unfortunately slower than we would like, but we hope that what is available is already useful nonetheless.

In 2023, we will also start processing the personal names mentioned in ancient authors in light of the Networks of Ideas and Knowledge in the Ancient World [NIKAW] project (2022-2026). These names will also be integrated in this portal.

Fig. 1: Schematic overview of Names in the ancient world tables.

The underlying database of the Names in the ancient world portal consists of a complex set of tables. At the heart of the structure in the NamRef table, where each attestation of a separate personal name is collected (currently 27,892 records). This is linked to the Ref table, where clusters of names referring to the same individual are grouped together as attestations of individuals (currently 14,598 records). The onomastic structure consists of three tiers, dealing with names (NAM), name variants (NAMVAR), and declined name variants (NAMVARCASE) respectively. The Nam table currently has 39,847 names. Each of these standard names is connected to a set of variants, often in different languages / scripts, in the NamVar table (239,068 variants). For each of these variants, declined forms were created in the NamVarCase table. This last table is the largest, with 1,032,681 entries, and forms the link between REF and NAMVAR & NAM. The original TM People structure developed for the Egyptian data also includes a prosopographic Per table, but as explained below this is not a feature we will implement for other regions.

Please keep in mind that the Nam table (in contrast to the NamVar table) has only been fully developed for names attested in Egypt. Several Greek and Latin name variants attested in other regions will be linked to this table if they also appear in Egypt, but there is still a large group of variants without an overarching standard name record. This will improve in the future while we process more names, but for indigenous names this requires a thorough familiarity with local onomastic habits. Since we do not have this expertise, this is something we will not undertake ourselves, but we are happy to collaborate with other projects to set this up for particular languages/regions. Please if you are interested!

The Names in the ancient world portal is not designed to become a prosopography of the ancient world. The focus is on (attestations of) personal names. We have therefore only developed the onomastic structure to standardize this data. Yet personal names obviously refer to people, and this component cannot be ignored completely. We have therefore retained the Ref level from the original TM People structure (which you can find here), a table where names that refer to a person in a single attestation (what we call an identification cluster) are grouped together. This table can be used as a starting point for other projects that would like to bring together prosopographies or even create new ones. Starting from this level of attestations has the benefit that different projects do not necessarily need to agree on prosopographical identifications. They are often tricky and speculative and require a lot of expertise on things such as imperial and local careers, regional epigraphic habits, etc. We will therefore not undertake such identifications ourselves, but aim to link to as many prosopographical projects as possible in order to guide our users to relevant information about the people behind the names. We currently already have links to the Lexicon of Greek Personal Names for Greek name variants, where prosopographical identifications have been made for each variant. For some other useful (online) prosopographies, see, for example, the Digital Prosopography of the Roman Republic, the Prosopography of the Byzantine Empire and Prosopography of the Byzantine World, and the original TM People for Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine Egypt (more are listed on the Digital Classicist Wiki). If you would like to collaborate in order to show links to your project on our website, please !

We hope that even in its current state the tool may prove useful enough to avert nemesis. Also, digital instruments such as this one have the advantage that they can be updated and improved easily. We would therefore be very grateful if users not only show clemency, but also help us improve the quality: suggestions and mistakes can be reported by clicking on 'Report an error' in the header above.

Online databases tend not to be quoted, or only reluctantly. Often scholars will not document the use of digital tools and point to the (printed version of the) sources directly. Gradually, however, scholarship seems to enter a new phase where online edition is taking over the front position from paper copy. For this purpose, we have developed stable numeric identifiers for each entry in each of the TM People tables. For more information, please consult the 'How to cite' section below.

Coverage estimates

Estimates of the progress made for various provinces (up until August 2023):

Province Greek inscriptions Latin inscriptions
Egypt 90% 100%
Creta & Cyrenaica Ptolemaic only 100%
Cyprus Ptolemaic only 100%
Mauretania Caesariensis 0 100%
Mauretania Tingitana 0 100%
Arabia 0 100%
Mesopotamia 0 100%
Iudaea 0 100%
Syria 0 100%
Asia 0 100%
Galatia 0 100%
Bithynia et Pontus 0 100%
Lycia et Pamphylia 0 100%
Cappadocia 0 100%
Cilicia 0 100%
Regnum Bosporum 0 100%
Armenia 0 100%

How to cite

We provide a similar system of stable numeric identifiers for names as in the other TM databases. This currently takes the following form:

Type of entity URI identifier Human readable
Attestation of a person's name(s) www.trismegistos.org/ref/1234 TM Ref 1234
Name variant www.trismegistos.org/namvar/1234 TM NamVar 1234
Name www.trismegistos.org/name/1234 TM Nam 1234

For more information on how to cite Trismegistos, please visit this page.

SNAP and NER for Latin inscriptions (2014-2015)

Prosopographies have in the past often taken decades or even centuries to produce. Even for a period with relatively few sources such as antiquity, hundreds of thousands of texts had to be collected and read, personal names had to be copied on index cards, people had to be identified across sources, their relations then had to be examined and their lives had to be reconstructed.

Fortunately in this digital age that enormous work can - at least partially - be automated. This a process the Standards for Networking Ancient Prosopographies: Data and Relations in Greco-Roman Names [SNAP] has experimented with: it does not only aim to bring together prosopographies just as the prosopographies themselves have brought together individuals in the sources; SNAP also wants to explore how to facilitate the creation of new prosopographies through Named Entity Recognition (NER). And this is where Leuven Ancient History and Trismegistos come in.

In 2008 Trismegistos started a project to collect all personal names in published texts from Egypt dated between 800 BC and AD 800. This new Trismegistos People database could build on the Prosopographia Ptolemaica, a Leuven project which started in the late 30ies, and which was transformed to a database in the 80ies. Just like its predecessor, Trismegistos People wanted to be multilingual, taking in not only Greek, but also Demotic and other Egyptian evidence. For Greek papyri, the full text of ca. 50,000 texts in the Papyrological Navigator [PN] was kindly put at our disposal, and this was to be our corpus for NER.

This is not the place to go into details. Those who want to know more can read an article of Bart Van Beek and Mark Depauw (The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 39 (2009), p. 31-47, available here), where the procedure is described that allowed us to deal with several hundred thousands of attestations of personal names.

When turning to Latin inscriptions, we faced new challenges, however. In the Europeana EAGLE project, Trismegistos disambiguated the datasets of partners such as EDH, EDR, HispEpOl and EDB, and the full text of the inscriptions is also available in Open Access. This again opened up exciting possibilities for SNAP, as we could again use NER to automate the collection of all attestations of personal names in this large corpus. You can read more about the challenges and methodology in Yanne Broux, ‘Ancient Profiles Exploited. First results of Named Entity Recognition Applied to Latin Inscriptions’, in: M. Nowak, A. Łajtar and J. Urbanik (eds.), Tell Me Who You Are: Labeling Status in the Graeco-Roman World (Studia Źródłoznawcze 16), Warsaw (2017), 11-33, available here.

In 2014, Trismegistos director Mark Depauw wrote: 'The NER system has currently progressed so far that I think we could get a complete database with all attestations of personal names in Latin inscriptions pretty soon given the funding needed to finetune the system and check its results. Even the onomastic analysis is a relatively easy task, with the cooperation of a few specialists. This way we could focus on the prosopographical aspects through SNAP and perhaps develop digitally assisted identifications of the people referred to in this enlarged Trismegistos People dataset.'

As you can see, 8 years later this has not yet materialized. Lack of funding (unfortunately, names have never really been a sexy topic) was the most important obstacle: with only one part-time position (with other responsibilities as well) to work on this, it is quite difficult to get such a large job done. Yet we carry on, slowly but steadily, and we are still confident that one day we will get there (if not in this life, then in the next).

Credits

General coordination: Yanne Broux
Database structure (Filemaker 14-18): Yanne Broux
Online version: Yanne Broux
Data processing Yanne Broux
Former collaborators: Mark Depauw (2011-2015), Thomas Mermans and Lisa Brunet (2016-2017), Edwin Croonen (volunteer from 2017-2020)